Deaf boy told to change his name because it violates school anti-gun policy (video)

Deaf Boy's name causes school district panic

We each have our challenges, for one three-year-old boy it’s his inability to hear. Yes, Hunter is deaf. That’s okay, people with disabilities have ways of compensating, in the case of those who are deaf or hard of hearing, they can communicate using sign language. Unfortunately for this little boy, his name, according to school officials, looks too much like a gun, which violates their anti-gun policy.

watch on YouTube

“The parents of a 3-year-old deaf boy from Nebraska say his preschool told them he must change the way he signs his name because it looks like a finger-pistol, but the school says the family has their signals crossed.

“The family of pre-schooler Hunter Spanjer said officials at the Grand Island Public Schools told them the manner in which the boy signs his name is a violation of its “weapons in school” policy. The claim they were told Hunter had to modify the way he signs his moniker to comply with the school’s zero tolerance code against weapons in school.”

The backlash from the community wasn’t something the school district was prepared for. Grand Island Public Schools said they have received hundreds of angry calls and emails.

“The encouragement and support is amazing,” Brian Spanjer, Hunter’s father, said. “It’s been more than I could have asked for and it’s been extremely helpful.”

After a Change.org petition to the school district and the involvment of the ACLU, Grand Island Public Schools made the following statement:

“Grand Island Public Schools has not changed the sign language name of any student, nor is it requiring any student to change how his or her name is signed. The school district teaches American Sign Language (“ASL”) for students with hearing impairments. ASL is recommended by the Nebraska Department of Education and is widely used in the United States. The sign language techniques taught in the school district are consistent with the standards of the Nebraska Department of Education and ASL.

“The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act prohibits the school district from disclosing personally identifiable information concerning any student without the prior written consent of the student’s parent.

“Therefore, the school district cannot discuss any particular student or identify any particular student.

“Grand Island Public Schools is not requiring any current student with a hearing impairment to change his or her sign language name. Our mission remains: Every Student, Every Day, a Success!”

Perhaps a bettery canned response would have been “we were wrong, and suggesting that a deaf child change his name because some pansy doesn’t like guns was monumentally stupid, we’re sorry, please stop calling us!”

Sources: American Thinker; 10 11 Now
Via: Shaun

Comments

  1. I married into a family of hunters, I hunt, we own guns, we taught our children to respect guns and what they are capable of. I am for gun control, controlling the size of clips and banning assault type weapons to the general public. HOWEVER, we have gone way, way, way overboard with political correctness these days. It is so sad that parents have to think about what MIGHT be offensive down the road when they name their child. It is sad that a child can’t use his/her imagination drawing pictures that MIGHT offend parents of another child. It is sad that a child can’t offer a hug or a kiss to another child because it might offend someone else. Let us get a grip on reality and go back to common sense!

    1. When we fought the Revolutionary War citizens had the same firearms as the oppressive government did. Sure, they were single-shot muskets at the time, but they were the most technologically advanced weaponry available to anyone at the time.

      Can you cite a single instance where a “standard, 30-round capacity” magazine (not a “clip”) was used in the commission of a crime? Would a 10-round magazine have prevented the crime? Reduced the casualties?

      How about an “assault type weapon”? First of all, isn’t assault something a person does with a weapon? The firearm itself cannot “assault” anyone. If you are for getting these “style” of firearms off the streets, do you support removing them from everyone except the military for fighting foreign wars?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>